Rossmeier v Mounthooly Transport & Ors [1999] ScotCS 244 (20 October 1999)

Rossmeier v Mounthooly Transport & Ors [1999] ScotCS 244 (20 October 1999)

The requirement to sist a mandatary for pursuers resident in another Member State is discriminatory under Article 12 EC Treaty and cannot be objectively justified where the Brussels Convention allows enforcement of Scottish judgments abroad; such requirement should not be imposed.

Citation
[1999] ScotCS 244
Parties
Pursuer and Appellant: Dieter Rossmeier; Defenders and Respondents: Mounthooly Transport and Others
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
20 October 1999
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Principal to Court of Session
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Discrimination on Grounds of Nationality, Sisting a Mandatary, Security for Costs, Brussels Convention Enforcement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dieter Rossmeier

Pursuer and Appellant

Mounthooly Transport and Others

Defenders and Respondents

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Principal to Court of Session

  1. 1 Whether requirement to sist a mandatary for pursuers resident outside the UK constitutes discrimination under Article 12 EC Treaty
  2. 2 Whether such requirement can be objectively justified given Brussels Convention enforcement

Ratio Decidendi

The requirement to sist a mandatary for pursuers resident in another Member State is discriminatory under Article 12 EC Treaty and cannot be objectively justified where the Brussels Convention allows enforcement of Scottish judgments abroad; such requirement should not be imposed.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Sheriff's order requiring pursuers to sist a mandatary recalled
  • Case remitted to Sheriff to proceed as accords