Magistrates of Edinburgh v. Lownie [1903] ScotLR 40_471 (19 March 1903)
An arbiter who becomes a member of one of the parties to the arbitration (here, the Town Council) is disqualified from acting, and this disqualification is not removed by subsequent resignation. The rule is absolute and not personal; prior involvement in the contract as adviser further supports disqualification. In the absence of waiver by both parties, either party may object to the arbiter's continued role.
- Citation
- [1903] ScotLR 40_471
- Parties
- Complainer/respondent: Lord Provost, Magistrates, and Town Council of Edinburgh; Respondent/reclaimer: John Lownie; Arbiter/respondent: William Ormiston
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 1903
- Procedural Posture
- Note of Suspension and Interdict / Inner House, First Division, on Reclaiming Motion
- Outcome
- Interdict granted; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to; Mr Ormiston interdicted from acting as arbiter.
- Legal Topics
- Disqualification of Arbiter, Conflict of Interest, Arbitration Procedure, Waiver of Objection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lord Provost, Magistrates, and Town Council of Edinburgh
Complainer/respondent
John Lownie
Respondent/reclaimer
William Ormiston
Arbiter/respondent
Procedural Posture
Note of Suspension and Interdict / Inner House, First Division, on Reclaiming Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an arbiter becomes disqualified by accepting office as a member of one of the parties to the arbitration (Town Council)
- 2 Whether resignation from such office removes the disqualification
- 3 Whether prior involvement/advice on the contract further disqualifies the arbiter
Ratio Decidendi
An arbiter who becomes a member of one of the parties to the arbitration (here, the Town Council) is disqualified from acting, and this disqualification is not removed by subsequent resignation. The rule is absolute and not personal; prior involvement in the contract as adviser further supports disqualification. In the absence of waiver by both parties, either party may object to the arbiter's continued role.
Court Disposition
Interdict granted; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to; Mr Ormiston interdicted from acting as arbiter.
Orders
- Interdict against Mr Ormiston acting as arbiter in the dispute under the contract between the Town Council and Lownie.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment