Chisholm Or Gray v Gray [1999] ScotCS 236 (13 October 1999)
Although there has been a change of circumstances since the original award, including both parties' retirement and changes in income, the pursuer remains dependent on the periodical allowance due to her age, ill health, and lack of employment prospects. The defender's means, including capital and income, remain stronger than the pursuer's. Termination or reduction of the allowance would force the pursuer to sell her home and is not justified on the evidence. The periodical allowance should continue at the existing rate of £110 per week.
- Citation
- [1999] ScotCS 236
- Parties
- Pursuer: Elizabeth Catherine Chisholm or Gray; Defender: James Alexander Gray
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Minute for Variation of Periodical Allowance in Divorce Proceedings / Judgment on Application to Vary Periodical Allowance
- Outcome
- Application to vary periodical allowance refused.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Periodical Allowance, Variation of Maintenance Orders, Financial Provision on Divorce
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elizabeth Catherine Chisholm or Gray
Pursuer
James Alexander Gray
Defender
Procedural Posture
Minute for Variation of Periodical Allowance in Divorce Proceedings / Judgment on Application to Vary Periodical Allowance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there has been a relevant change of circumstances justifying variation of periodical allowance under section 5(4) of the Divorce (Scotland) Act 1976
- 2 Whether the periodical allowance should be terminated, reduced, or time-limited in light of the parties' current means and circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
Although there has been a change of circumstances since the original award, including both parties' retirement and changes in income, the pursuer remains dependent on the periodical allowance due to her age, ill health, and lack of employment prospects. The defender's means, including capital and income, remain stronger than the pursuer's. Termination or reduction of the allowance would force the pursuer to sell her home and is not justified on the evidence. The periodical allowance should continue at the existing rate of £110 per week.
Court Disposition
Application to vary periodical allowance refused.
Orders
- Repel the second plea-in-law stated in the defender's Minute.
- Refuse the crave of the Minute.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment