Helkimo Or Kennett Or Robertson v Robertson [2001] ScotCS 62 (14 March 2001)
The award of expenses was expressly limited to those directly attributable to the three days of proof (26, 27, and 28 October 1999), and did not include general preparatory expenses or expenses for the first day of proof. The Auditor erred in allowing such preparatory expenses.
- Citation
- [2001] ScotCS 62
- Parties
- Pursuer: Irma Elina Helkimo or Kennett or Robertson; Defender: David Callum Robertson
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Consistorial (divorce and Ancillary Relief) / Post Divorce, Taxation of Expenses
- Outcome
- Objections by the defender upheld; Auditor directed to amend report by deleting preparatory expenses from allowable account.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Expenses, Taxation of Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Irma Elina Helkimo or Kennett or Robertson
Pursuer
David Callum Robertson
Defender
Procedural Posture
Consistorial (divorce and Ancillary Relief) / Post Divorce, Taxation of Expenses
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer is entitled to recover preparatory expenses for the proof beyond the three days specified in the interlocutor of 21 February 2000.
Ratio Decidendi
The award of expenses was expressly limited to those directly attributable to the three days of proof (26, 27, and 28 October 1999), and did not include general preparatory expenses or expenses for the first day of proof. The Auditor erred in allowing such preparatory expenses.
Court Disposition
Objections by the defender upheld; Auditor directed to amend report by deleting preparatory expenses from allowable account.
Orders
- Auditor to delete from the account of allowable expenses the items set out in paragraph [4] of the Opinion.
- Consequential alterations to other matters in the account, such as Value Added Tax, to be made.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment