ASA AGAINST AZD AND ANOTHER [2020] ScotCS CSOH_63 (15 April 2020)
The court found that the relevant date of separation was 12 August 2017, based on the parties' conduct and credible evidence, particularly the pursuer's adherence to Islamic cultural norms regarding cohabitation. The matrimonial home was valued at £625,000 as at the relevant date, accepting the expert evidence of Mr Reilly. The shareholding in CDC Limited was valued at £239,000 as at the relevant date, preferring the methodology and evidence of Mr Rowand over that of Mr Wilkinson. The division of matrimonial property was to be carried out in accordance with these findings, applying the statutory framework for fairness.
- Citation
- [2020] ScotCS CSOH_63
- Parties
- Pursuer: ASA; First Defender: AZD; Second Defender: UN Bank
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce and Financial Provision / Final Judgment After Proof
- Outcome
- Divorce granted; orders for financial provision made in accordance with findings on valuation and division of matrimonial property.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Financial Provision on Divorce, Matrimonial Property, Valuation of Assets, Relevant Date of Separation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ASA
Pursuer
AZD
First Defender
UN Bank
Second Defender
Procedural Posture
Divorce and Financial Provision / Final Judgment After Proof
Legal Issues
- 1 Determination of the relevant date of separation for matrimonial property purposes
- 2 Valuation of the matrimonial home
- 3 Valuation of shareholdings in CDC Limited and DY Limited
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the relevant date of separation was 12 August 2017, based on the parties' conduct and credible evidence, particularly the pursuer's adherence to Islamic cultural norms regarding cohabitation. The matrimonial home was valued at £625,000 as at the relevant date, accepting the expert evidence of Mr Reilly. The shareholding in CDC Limited was valued at £239,000 as at the relevant date, preferring the methodology and evidence of Mr Rowand over that of Mr Wilkinson. The division of matrimonial property was to be carried out in accordance with these findings, applying the statutory framework for fairness.
Court Disposition
Divorce granted; orders for financial provision made in accordance with findings on valuation and division of matrimonial property.
Orders
- Divorce pronounced in favour of ASA against AZD.
- Matrimonial home valued at £625,000 for division purposes.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment