Teresa Maria Middleton against Allan Alexander Middleton (Sheriff Court Civil) [2025] SCPHD 28 (23 May 2025)
The court found the marriage had irretrievably broken down due to non-cohabitation for over two years. The St James's Place pension, though sourced from pre-marital employment, was converted into matrimonial property by transfer during the marriage, justifying a 90/10 split in favour of the defender due to the source of funds but recognising deliberate conversion. The defender's Legal & General pension was excluded as it derived solely from pre-marital efforts. The defender's inheritance was not matrimonial property. The pursuer was entitled to a capital sum reflecting her share of the assets, including an adjustment for the defender's post-separation mortgage payments. The matrimonial...
- Citation
- [2025] SCPHD 28
- Parties
- Pursuer: Teresa Maria Walsh or Preston or Middleton; Defender: Allan Alexander Middleton
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce and Financial Provision / Final Judgment After Proof
- Outcome
- Decree of divorce granted; financial orders made for division of assets and payment of capital sum.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Financial Provision on Divorce, Matrimonial Property, Pensions, Inheritance, Division of Assets
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Teresa Maria Walsh or Preston or Middleton
Pursuer
Allan Alexander Middleton
Defender
Procedural Posture
Divorce and Financial Provision / Final Judgment After Proof
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the marriage has broken down irretrievably for divorce to be granted
- 2 Identification and valuation of matrimonial property
- 3 Treatment of pensions and inheritances as matrimonial or non-matrimonial property
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the marriage had irretrievably broken down due to non-cohabitation for over two years. The St James's Place pension, though sourced from pre-marital employment, was converted into matrimonial property by transfer during the marriage, justifying a 90/10 split in favour of the defender due to the source of funds but recognising deliberate conversion. The defender's Legal & General pension was excluded as it derived solely from pre-marital efforts. The defender's inheritance was not matrimonial property. The pursuer was entitled to a capital sum reflecting her share of the assets, including an adjustment for the defender's post-separation mortgage payments. The matrimonial...
Court Disposition
Decree of divorce granted; financial orders made for division of assets and payment of capital sum.
Orders
- Divorce granted to pursuer.
- Order for sale of matrimonial home and equal division of net free proceeds.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment