Smith (AP) v South Ayrshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2000] ScotCS 151 (7 June 2000)

Smith (AP) v South Ayrshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2000] ScotCS 151 (7 June 2000)

The averments, though simple, allow inference of deviation from normal practice and are sufficiently specified to entitle the pursuer to proof; Hunter v Hanley applies and the pursuer's case should proceed.

Citation
[2000] ScotCS 151
Parties
Pursuer: Olive Rigg Smith; Defenders: South Ayrshire Hospitals NHS Trust
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
07 June 2000
Procedural Posture
Medical Negligence Damages Action / Procedure Roll on Defenders' Plea to Relevancy
Outcome
Proof allowed
Legal Topics
Duty of Care, Breach of Duty, Specification of Pleadings, Deviation From Normal Practice
Tort Medical Negligence Duty of Care Breach of Duty Specification of Pleadings Deviation From Normal Practice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Olive Rigg Smith

Pursuer

South Ayrshire Hospitals NHS Trust

Defenders

Procedural Posture

Medical Negligence Damages Action / Procedure Roll on Defenders' Plea to Relevancy

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether averments against Mr Tauro are sufficiently specified to entitle pursuer to proof
  2. 2 Application of Hunter v Hanley test in medical negligence cases

Ratio Decidendi

The averments, though simple, allow inference of deviation from normal practice and are sufficiently specified to entitle the pursuer to proof; Hunter v Hanley applies and the pursuer's case should proceed.

Court Disposition

Proof allowed

Orders

  • Case against Mr Tauro not excluded from probation
  • Action to proceed to proof