Fairlie v. Perth and Kinross Healthcare NHS Trust [2004] ScotCS 174 (08 July 2004)

Fairlie v. Perth and Kinross Healthcare NHS Trust [2004] ScotCS 174 (08 July 2004)

A consultant psychiatrist owes a duty of care to the patient, not to third parties such as the alleged abuser, during treatment and management. Harm to reputation and family relations caused by statements made in the course of treatment is not actionable in negligence absent proof of psychiatric injury. The pursuer's pleadings do not disclose a relevant case in law and the action must be dismissed.

Citation
[2004] ScotCS 174
Parties
Pursuer: James McGregor Fairlie; Defenders: Perth & Kinross Healthcare NHS Trust
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
08 July 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Action for Damages / Procedure Roll (motion to Dismiss)
Outcome
Action dismissed
Legal Topics
Duty of Care, Psychiatric Treatment, Recovered Memory Therapy, Loss of Reputation, Family Relations, Personal Injury
Tort Medical Negligence Duty of Care Psychiatric Treatment Recovered Memory Therapy Loss of Reputation Family Relations Personal Injury

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James McGregor Fairlie

Pursuer

Perth & Kinross Healthcare NHS Trust

Defenders

Procedural Posture

Civil Action for Damages / Procedure Roll (motion to Dismiss)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a consultant psychiatrist owes a duty of care to the parent of a patient in respect of statements made during treatment
  2. 2 Whether harm to reputation and family relations is actionable in negligence absent psychiatric injury
  3. 3 Whether the pursuer's pleadings disclose a relevant case in law

Ratio Decidendi

A consultant psychiatrist owes a duty of care to the patient, not to third parties such as the alleged abuser, during treatment and management. Harm to reputation and family relations caused by statements made in the course of treatment is not actionable in negligence absent proof of psychiatric injury. The pursuer's pleadings do not disclose a relevant case in law and the action must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Action dismissed

Orders

  • Action dismissed as a matter of law
  • First plea-in-law repelled of consent