Tierney v. Biffa Waste Services Ltd & Anor [2005] ScotCS CSOH_18 (02 February 2005)

Tierney v. Biffa Waste Services Ltd & Anor [2005] ScotCS CSOH_18 (02 February 2005)

There was insufficient evidence to establish that the third party owed or breached a duty of care to the pursuer or that any act or omission by the third party caused or contributed to the accident. The defenders failed to prove the third party was at fault.

Citation
[2005] ScotCS CSOH_18
Parties
Pursuer: Stephen Tierney; Defender: Biffa Waste Services Ltd; Third Party: Mark Fotheringham
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
02 February 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Action for Contribution/damages / Judgment After Proof (trial)
Outcome
Third party assoilzied (absolved of liability); no contribution ordered.
Legal Topics
Duty of Care, Negligence, Causation, Contribution Between Wrongdoers

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stephen Tierney

Pursuer

Biffa Waste Services Ltd

Defender

Mark Fotheringham

Third Party

Procedural Posture

Civil Action for Contribution/damages / Judgment After Proof (trial)

  1. 1 Whether the third party owed a duty of care to the pursuer
  2. 2 Whether the third party breached any duty of care
  3. 3 Whether the third party's actions caused or contributed to the pursuer's injury

Ratio Decidendi

There was insufficient evidence to establish that the third party owed or breached a duty of care to the pursuer or that any act or omission by the third party caused or contributed to the accident. The defenders failed to prove the third party was at fault.

Court Disposition

Third party assoilzied (absolved of liability); no contribution ordered.

Orders

  • Third party assoilzied (absolved of liability)
  • No order for contribution against the third party