Connell v. James Nimmo & Co., Ltd [1923] ScotLR 473 (25 May 1923)
The accumulation of inflammable gas in the mine, which was not discovered or remedied due to the negligence of the fireman entrusted with inspection duties, constituted a defect in the condition of the ways and works under section 1(1) of the Employers' Liability Act 1880. The employer was liable for the resulting injury, as the statutory requirements for liability were met.
- Citation
- [1923] ScotLR 473
- Parties
- Pursuer/respondent: George Connell; Defenders/appellants: James Nimmo & Company, Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 1923
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (reparation/employer's Liability) / Appeal to Court of Session Inner House, First Division, From Sheriff Court by Way of Stated Case
- Outcome
- Appeal refused; Sheriff's decision affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Employers' Liability, Master and Servant, Industrial Accidents, Statutory Interpretation, Mine Safety
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George Connell
Pursuer/respondent
James Nimmo & Company, Limited
Defenders/appellants
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (reparation/employer's Liability) / Appeal to Court of Session Inner House, First Division, From Sheriff Court by Way of Stated Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accumulation of gas in a mine constitutes a defect in the condition of the ways and works under section 1(1) of the Employers' Liability Act 1880
- 2 Whether the pursuer's pleadings and proof were sufficient to establish liability under the Act
- 3 Whether the employer is liable where the defect was not discovered or remedied owing to the negligence of a person entrusted with inspection duties
Ratio Decidendi
The accumulation of inflammable gas in the mine, which was not discovered or remedied due to the negligence of the fireman entrusted with inspection duties, constituted a defect in the condition of the ways and works under section 1(1) of the Employers' Liability Act 1880. The employer was liable for the resulting injury, as the statutory requirements for liability were met.
Court Disposition
Appeal refused; Sheriff's decision affirmed.
Orders
- Both questions of law answered in the affirmative.
- Defenders (employers) found liable to pursuer (workman) for £325 damages under the Employers' Liability Act 1880.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment