M'Culloch v. Clyde Navigation Trustees [1903] ScotLR 40_820 (15 July 1903)

M'Culloch v. Clyde Navigation Trustees [1903] ScotLR 40_820 (15 July 1903)

The pursuer's averments were irrelevant because the defenders were not bound to provide against the unforeseen results of fire in a shed constructed in the usual manner and fit for its ordinary purpose; vague allegations of prior notice were insufficient to establish liability.

Citation
[1903] ScotLR 40_820
Parties
Pursuer: James M'Culloch; Defender: Clyde Navigation Trustees
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
15 July 1903
Procedural Posture
Action of Damages for Personal Injury / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session Inner House, Second Division
Outcome
action dismissed
Legal Topics
Employer's Liability, Duty to Public, Building Safety, Personal Injury, Specification of Negligence
Tort Reparation Negligence Employer's Liability Duty to Public Building Safety Personal Injury Specification of Negligence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James M'Culloch

Pursuer

Clyde Navigation Trustees

Defender

Procedural Posture

Action of Damages for Personal Injury / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session Inner House, Second Division

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defenders owed a duty to construct the shed to withstand fire and prevent collapse
  2. 2 Whether prior notice of defective construction imposed liability for fire-related collapse
  3. 3 Whether the pursuer's averments were sufficiently specific and relevant to entitle him to proof

Ratio Decidendi

The pursuer's averments were irrelevant because the defenders were not bound to provide against the unforeseen results of fire in a shed constructed in the usual manner and fit for its ordinary purpose; vague allegations of prior notice were insufficient to establish liability.

Court Disposition

action dismissed

Orders

  • action dismissed
  • no proof allowed