McNulty v Marshalls Food Group Ltd [1998] ScotCS 35 (23 October 1998)
The court found that the accident materially contributed to the pursuer's lumbar disc prolapse and that the neck injury was also caused by the accident. The pursuer is entitled to damages for both injuries, including solatium and loss of earnings, calculated using the Ogden Tables and a 3% discount rate as per Wells v Wells.
- Citation
- [1998] ScotCS 35
- Parties
- Pursuer: James McNulty; Defenders: Marshalls Food Group Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Action / Judgment After Proof (trial) on Quantum
- Outcome
- Judgment for the pursuer
- Legal Topics
- Employer's Liability, Causation of Injury, Assessment of Damages, Loss of Earnings, Solatium, Use of Actuarial Tables
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James McNulty
Pursuer
Marshalls Food Group Ltd
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Action / Judgment After Proof (trial) on Quantum
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer's lumbar disc prolapse was caused by the workplace accident on 15 March 1995
- 2 Whether subsequent neck symptoms were caused by the accident
- 3 Assessment of appropriate damages for pain, suffering, and loss of earnings
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the accident materially contributed to the pursuer's lumbar disc prolapse and that the neck injury was also caused by the accident. The pursuer is entitled to damages for both injuries, including solatium and loss of earnings, calculated using the Ogden Tables and a 3% discount rate as per Wells v Wells.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the pursuer
Orders
- Award of solatium in the sum of £20,000
- Award of past loss of earnings in the sum of £45,675
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment