McLean v Caledonian MacBrayne Ltd [1999] ScotCS 6 (8 January 1999)
Although the defenders breached statutory duties by failing to provide a gate in the inner railing, the pursuer's accident was not caused by this breach, as the slip occurred after the dangerous stage of climbing was complete; thus, causation was not established and the claim fails.
- Citation
- [1999] ScotCS 6
- Parties
- Pursuer: John McLean; Defenders: Caledonian MacBrayne Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 08 January 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Action / Judgment After Proof (trial) at First Instance
- Outcome
- Decree of absolvitor granted in favour of the defenders; pursuer's claim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Employer's Liability, Statutory Duties Under Merchant Shipping Regulations, Safe Means of Access, Causation, Assessment of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John McLean
Pursuer
Caledonian MacBrayne Limited
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Action / Judgment After Proof (trial) at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defenders breached statutory or common law duties to provide safe access to the walkway
- 2 Whether the breach caused the pursuer's injury
- 3 Assessment of the nature and consequences of the injury
Ratio Decidendi
Although the defenders breached statutory duties by failing to provide a gate in the inner railing, the pursuer's accident was not caused by this breach, as the slip occurred after the dangerous stage of climbing was complete; thus, causation was not established and the claim fails.
Court Disposition
Decree of absolvitor granted in favour of the defenders; pursuer's claim dismissed.
Orders
- Sustain defenders' third plea-in-law
- Repel pursuer's third plea-in-law
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment