Nisbet v. Chief Constable Strathclyde Police & Anor [2002] ScotCS 101 (10th April, 2002)

Nisbet v. Chief Constable Strathclyde Police & Anor [2002] ScotCS 101 (10th April, 2002)

The pursuer failed to aver that the Chief Constable was his employer or in control of the workplace or the relevant matter at the material time, and failed to aver foreseeability of risk by the janitor; thus, no relevant case was made against either defender.

Citation
[2002] ScotCS 101
Parties
Pursuer: Robert Nisbet; First Defender: John Orr, Chief Constable, Strathclyde Police; Second Defender: North Lanarkshire Council
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Action / Debate on Relevancy (pleas in Law)
Outcome
Action dismissed
Legal Topics
Employer's Liability, Vicarious Liability, Statutory Duty, Foreseeability, Workplace Safety
Tort Employment Law Health and Safety Employer's Liability Vicarious Liability Statutory Duty Foreseeability Workplace Safety

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert Nisbet

Pursuer

John Orr, Chief Constable, Strathclyde Police

First Defender

North Lanarkshire Council

Second Defender

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury Action / Debate on Relevancy (pleas in Law)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Chief Constable was liable under the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 for injuries to a police constable prior to the Police (Health and Safety) Act 1997 coming into force.
  2. 2 Whether North Lanarkshire Council was vicariously liable for the janitor's alleged negligence in failing to prevent a slippery floor and failing to warn.

Ratio Decidendi

The pursuer failed to aver that the Chief Constable was his employer or in control of the workplace or the relevant matter at the material time, and failed to aver foreseeability of risk by the janitor; thus, no relevant case was made against either defender.

Court Disposition

Action dismissed

Orders

  • Sustained first pleas-in-law for both defenders
  • Dismissed the action