Mcshane v Burnwynd Racing Stables Ltd [2015] ScotCS CSOH_70 (05 June 2015)
The pursuer failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the accident was caused by a defect in the gallop or by any breach of duty by the defenders. The evidence did not establish that the surface was defective or that any statutory or common law duty was breached. The accident was more likely a result of the inherent risks of riding, not attributable to the defenders' fault.
- Citation
- [2015] ScotCS CSOH_70
- Parties
- Pursuer: John McShane; Defender: Burnwynd Racing Stables Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 05 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury/negligence / Judgment After Proof (trial)
- Outcome
- Pursuer's claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Employer's Liability, Workplace Safety, Negligence, Workplace (health, Safety & Welfare) Regulations 1992, Work at Height Regulations 2005
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John McShane
Pursuer
Burnwynd Racing Stables Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury/negligence / Judgment After Proof (trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accident was caused by a defect in the gallop surface or layout
- 2 Whether the defenders were negligent at common law or in breach of statutory duties under the Workplace Regulations and/or Work at Height Regulations
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the accident was caused by a defect in the gallop or by any breach of duty by the defenders. The evidence did not establish that the surface was defective or that any statutory or common law duty was breached. The accident was more likely a result of the inherent risks of riding, not attributable to the defenders' fault.
Court Disposition
Pursuer's claim dismissed
Orders
- Action dismissed
- No decree for damages
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment