Robertson v Anderson [2001] ScotCS 114 (15 May 2001)
The court found as fact that an agreement to share equally any National bingo prize was made between the parties on the night in question. Such an agreement is not a sponsio ludicra but a collateral contract, and is therefore legally enforceable. The pursuer is entitled to a half share of the National bingo prize won by the defender.
- Citation
- [2001] ScotCS 114
- Parties
- Pursuer: Isobel Robertson; Defender: Lorna Anderson
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Outer House, Court of Session, Proof Before Answer
- Outcome
- Judgment for the pursuer
- Legal Topics
- Enforceability of Informal Agreements, Sponsio Ludicra, Collateral Contracts to Gaming, Division of Gambling Winnings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Isobel Robertson
Pursuer
Lorna Anderson
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Outer House, Court of Session, Proof Before Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an agreement to share bingo winnings was made between the parties
- 2 Whether such an agreement is legally enforceable or void as a sponsio ludicra
Ratio Decidendi
The court found as fact that an agreement to share equally any National bingo prize was made between the parties on the night in question. Such an agreement is not a sponsio ludicra but a collateral contract, and is therefore legally enforceable. The pursuer is entitled to a half share of the National bingo prize won by the defender.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the pursuer
Orders
- Defender to pay the pursuer one half of the National bingo prize won on 21 November 1997, being £54,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment