PETITION OF GREENPEACE LTD FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW [2020] ScotCS CSOH_88 (01 October 2020)
The petition is incompetent as there is a statutory appeal mechanism under Regulation 16 that encompasses the Secretary of State's agreement; the supervisory jurisdiction of the court is not required where another process exists.
- Citation
- [2020] ScotCS CSOH_88
- Parties
- Petitioner: Greenpeace Ltd; First Respondent: Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy; Second Respondent: Oil and Gas Authority; Interested Party: BP Exploration Operating Company Limited; Interested Party: Ithaca
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 01 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Permission to Proceed
- Outcome
- Permission to proceed refused
- Legal Topics
- Environmental Impact Assessment Directive, Judicial Review, Statutory Appeal Mechanism, Transposition of EU Directives, Access to Justice Under Aarhus Convention
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Greenpeace Ltd
Petitioner
Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy
First Respondent
Oil and Gas Authority
Second Respondent
BP Exploration Operating Company Limited
Interested Party
Ithaca
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Permission to Proceed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Offshore Petroleum Production and Pipelines (Assessment of Environmental Effects) Regulations 1999 fully transpose the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive
- 2 Competency of judicial review versus statutory appeal under Regulation 16
- 3 Scope of Regulation 16 appeal regarding Secretary of State's agreement
Ratio Decidendi
The petition is incompetent as there is a statutory appeal mechanism under Regulation 16 that encompasses the Secretary of State's agreement; the supervisory jurisdiction of the court is not required where another process exists.
Court Disposition
Permission to proceed refused
Orders
- Petition dismissed
- No permission to proceed with judicial review
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment