Anderson's Trustees v. Matthew and Others [1916] ScotLR 320 (17 December 1916)

Anderson's Trustees v. Matthew and Others [1916] ScotLR 320 (17 December 1916)

Estate duty on the heritable property does not fall to be paid out of residue but must be borne rateably by both the beneficiaries of the bequest (Messrs Anderson) and those entitled to the £40,000 charge, in proportion to their respective interests, as required by the Finance Act 1894 sections 9(4) and 14(1).

Citation
[1916] ScotLR 320
Parties
First Parties: William Verden Anderson and others (Trustees of Charles Anderson); Second Parties: William Verden Anderson (individual) and George Anderson; Third Parties: Patrick Matthew and others (beneficiaries of £40,000); Fourth Parties: Foreign Mission Committee of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland and others (residuary legatees)
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
17 December 1916
Procedural Posture
Special Case (court of Session, Inner House, Second Division) / Judgment on Questions of Law Regarding Incidence of Estate Duty
Outcome
Questions 1, 2, and 3 answered in the negative; question 4 answered in the affirmative. Estate duty to be borne rateably by the second parties and the beneficiaries of the £40,000 charge.
Legal Topics
Estate Duty, Incidence of Taxation, Trust Administration, Bequests and Burdens, Finance Act 1894 Interpretation
Revenue Law Trusts and Estates Estate Duty Incidence of Taxation Trust Administration Bequests and Burdens Finance Act 1894 Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Verden Anderson and others (Trustees of Charles Anderson)

First Parties

William Verden Anderson (individual) and George Anderson

Second Parties

Patrick Matthew and others (beneficiaries of £40,000)

Third Parties

Foreign Mission Committee of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland and others (residuary legatees)

Fourth Parties

Procedural Posture

Special Case (court of Session, Inner House, Second Division) / Judgment on Questions of Law Regarding Incidence of Estate Duty

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Who is liable for payment of estate duty on heritable property bequeathed subject to a charge?
  2. 2 Does the estate duty fall to be paid out of residue, by the beneficiaries of the bequest, or by those entitled to a sum charged on the property, or in rateable proportions?

Ratio Decidendi

Estate duty on the heritable property does not fall to be paid out of residue but must be borne rateably by both the beneficiaries of the bequest (Messrs Anderson) and those entitled to the £40,000 charge, in proportion to their respective interests, as required by the Finance Act 1894 sections 9(4) and 14(1).

Court Disposition

Questions 1, 2, and 3 answered in the negative; question 4 answered in the affirmative. Estate duty to be borne rateably by the second parties and the beneficiaries of the £40,000 charge.

Orders

  • Estate duty of £1,625 12s 8d to be apportioned rateably between Messrs Anderson and the beneficiaries of the £40,000 in accordance with their respective interests.