G & S Properties v Francis & Anor [2001] ScotCS 148 (13 June 2001)

G & S Properties v Francis & Anor [2001] ScotCS 148 (13 June 2001)

The court held that under the statutory definition of 'sole selling rights', commission is only payable to the estate agent if the agent themselves introduced the purchaser or conducted negotiations with them during the contract period. The term 'introduction' in this context does not include introductions by other agents, the seller, or by chance. The court followed the reasoning in Michael Harwood v Smith and rejected the broader interpretation advanced by the pursuers.

Citation
[2001] ScotCS 148
Parties
Pursuers and Appellants: G. & S. Properties; Defenders and Respondents: Donald Francis and Another
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
13 June 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Sheriff Court (civil, Contract/commission) / Appeal to Inner House, Court of Session
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Estate Agency Commission, Interpretation of 'sole Selling Rights', Contra Proferentem, Statutory Interpretation, Estate Agents Act 1979, Estate Agents (provision of Information) Regulations 1991
Contract Law Property Law Agency Law Estate Agency Commission Interpretation of 'sole Selling Rights' Contra Proferentem Statutory Interpretation Estate Agents Act 1979 +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

G. & S. Properties

Pursuers and Appellants

Donald Francis and Another

Defenders and Respondents

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Sheriff Court (civil, Contract/commission) / Appeal to Inner House, Court of Session

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether estate agents are entitled to commission under a 'sole selling rights' contract when the purchaser was not introduced by them but by another agent or by chance after termination of their engagement.
  2. 2 Proper interpretation of the 'introduction' requirement in the statutory definition of 'sole selling rights'.
  3. 3 Applicability of contra proferentem to statutory contract terms.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that under the statutory definition of 'sole selling rights', commission is only payable to the estate agent if the agent themselves introduced the purchaser or conducted negotiations with them during the contract period. The term 'introduction' in this context does not include introductions by other agents, the seller, or by chance. The court followed the reasoning in Michael Harwood v Smith and rejected the broader interpretation advanced by the pursuers.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.