SOUTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL v. CAROL GILLESPIE [2012] ScotSC 49 (17 April 2012)

SOUTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL v. CAROL GILLESPIE [2012] ScotSC 49 (17 April 2012)

The appeal was refused because the Sheriff was entitled to find that the defender knowingly allowed her property to be used for drug dealing, constituting a breach of tenancy and statutory grounds for recovery. The Sheriff properly considered all relevant statutory factors and exercised his discretion reasonably; there was no error of law or misuse of discretion warranting appellate interference.

Citation
[2012] ScotSC 49
Parties
Pursuers and Respondents: South Lanarkshire Council; Defender and Appellant: Carol Gillespie
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
17 April 2012
Procedural Posture
Summary Cause Action for Recovery of Possession of Heritable Property / Appeal Against Decree for Recovery of Possession
Outcome
Appeal refused; decree for recovery of possession adhered to.
Legal Topics
Eviction, Breach of Tenancy Agreement, Drug Offences, Judicial Discretion, Reasonableness of Eviction
Housing Law Landlord and Tenant Law Criminal Law Eviction Breach of Tenancy Agreement Drug Offences Judicial Discretion Reasonableness of Eviction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

South Lanarkshire Council

Pursuers and Respondents

Carol Gillespie

Defender and Appellant

Procedural Posture

Summary Cause Action for Recovery of Possession of Heritable Property / Appeal Against Decree for Recovery of Possession

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defender was in breach of her tenancy agreement by allowing the property to be used for illegal purposes
  2. 2 Whether it was reasonable to grant decree for recovery of possession given the defender's knowledge and circumstances
  3. 3 Whether the Sheriff's exercise of discretion was correct in law

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was refused because the Sheriff was entitled to find that the defender knowingly allowed her property to be used for drug dealing, constituting a breach of tenancy and statutory grounds for recovery. The Sheriff properly considered all relevant statutory factors and exercised his discretion reasonably; there was no error of law or misuse of discretion warranting appellate interference.

Court Disposition

Appeal refused; decree for recovery of possession adhered to.

Orders

  • Refusal of appeal against decree for recovery of possession
  • Adherence to Sheriff's interlocutor of 24 November 2011