Mars Pension Trustees Ltd v County Properties & Developments Ltd & Ors [1998] ScotCS 93 (4 December 1998)
Clause 12 of the lease, properly construed, clearly excludes the implied common law warranty of tenantability/fitness for purpose, including wind and water tightness. However, certificates under Clause 4.2 are only conclusive evidence of the service charge once the fair proportion under Clause 1.22.3 has been properly notified and finalised; until then, the certificate is not final.
- Citation
- [1998] ScotCS 93
- Parties
- Pursuers and Reclaimers: Mars Pension Trustees Limited; First Defenders and Respondents: County Properties & Developments Limited; Second Defenders and Respondents: Another (Second Defenders)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Reclaiming Motion (appeal) / Interlocutory Appeal on Exclusion of Warranty and Finality of Certificates
- Outcome
- Reclaiming motion allowed in respect of exclusion of implied warranty; dismissed in respect of finality of certificates; case put out by order for further procedure.
- Legal Topics
- Exclusion of Implied Terms, Construction of Exclusion/exemption Clauses, Service Charge Disputes, Finality of Certificates in Leases
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mars Pension Trustees Limited
Pursuers and Reclaimers
County Properties & Developments Limited
First Defenders and Respondents
Another (Second Defenders)
Second Defenders and Respondents
Procedural Posture
Reclaiming Motion (appeal) / Interlocutory Appeal on Exclusion of Warranty and Finality of Certificates
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Clause 12 of the lease excludes the implied common law warranty of tenantability/fitness for purpose
- 2 Whether certificates issued under Clause 4.2 are conclusive evidence of the service charge due, notwithstanding unresolved disputes under Clause 1.22.3
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 12 of the lease, properly construed, clearly excludes the implied common law warranty of tenantability/fitness for purpose, including wind and water tightness. However, certificates under Clause 4.2 are only conclusive evidence of the service charge once the fair proportion under Clause 1.22.3 has been properly notified and finalised; until then, the certificate is not final.
Court Disposition
Reclaiming motion allowed in respect of exclusion of implied warranty; dismissed in respect of finality of certificates; case put out by order for further procedure.
Orders
- Clause 12 held to exclude implied warranty of tenantability/fitness for purpose.
- First defenders' averments on wind and water tightness excluded from probation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment