Henderson v. Henderson's Trustees [1901] ScotLR 38_639 (01 June 1901)
The respondents were not premature in printing as they communicated with the reclaimers, who did not discourage printing; thus, full expenses for printing were justified.
- Citation
- [1901] ScotLR 38_639
- Parties
- Petitioners/reclaimers: Alexander Henderson and others; Respondents: William John Menzies, W. S., and John Henry Robertson, stockbroker (Trustees)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 1901
- Procedural Posture
- Petition for Sequestration of Trust Estates / Reclaiming Note (appeal) Withdrawn Before Hearing
- Outcome
- Reclaimers found liable in £6, 6s. of modified expenses.
- Legal Topics
- Expenses, Withdrawal of Appeal, Sequestration of Trust Estate
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alexander Henderson and others
Petitioners/reclaimers
William John Menzies, W. S., and John Henry Robertson, stockbroker (Trustees)
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Petition for Sequestration of Trust Estates / Reclaiming Note (appeal) Withdrawn Before Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether respondents are entitled to full expenses after reclaiming-note withdrawn
- 2 Whether respondents acted prematurely in printing documents
Ratio Decidendi
The respondents were not premature in printing as they communicated with the reclaimers, who did not discourage printing; thus, full expenses for printing were justified.
Court Disposition
Reclaimers found liable in £6, 6s. of modified expenses.
Orders
- Reclaimers to pay £6, 6s. to respondents as expenses.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment