Jack v. Black [1911] ScotLR 586 (15 March 1911)
The defender is entitled to expenses incurred in preparing for trial from the date when it was reasonable to expect the pursuer to have accepted the tender (22nd February 1911), as the pursuer had sufficient time to consider the tender by then. The pursuer is entitled to expenses up to the date of the tender (10th February 1911).
- Citation
- [1911] ScotLR 586
- Parties
- Pursuer (respondent): Jack; Defender (reclaimer): Black
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 1911
- Procedural Posture
- Action of Damages for Wrongous Use of Diligence / Reclaiming Note Against Interlocutor on Expenses After Acceptance of Tender
- Outcome
- Lord Ordinary's interlocutor as to expenses recalled; new order as to allocation of expenses issued.
- Legal Topics
- Expenses, Tender, Delay in Accepting Tender, Taxation of Judicial Accounts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jack
Pursuer (respondent)
Black
Defender (reclaimer)
Procedural Posture
Action of Damages for Wrongous Use of Diligence / Reclaiming Note Against Interlocutor on Expenses After Acceptance of Tender
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defender is entitled to expenses incurred between the date a tender ought reasonably to have been accepted and its actual acceptance
- 2 What constitutes a reasonable time for acceptance of a tender
Ratio Decidendi
The defender is entitled to expenses incurred in preparing for trial from the date when it was reasonable to expect the pursuer to have accepted the tender (22nd February 1911), as the pursuer had sufficient time to consider the tender by then. The pursuer is entitled to expenses up to the date of the tender (10th February 1911).
Court Disposition
Lord Ordinary's interlocutor as to expenses recalled; new order as to allocation of expenses issued.
Orders
- Pursuer entitled to expenses up to 10th February 1911 (date of tender).
- Defender entitled to expenses (if any) incurred subsequent to 22nd February 1911.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment