Macleod's Factor v. Busfeild and Others [1914] ScotLR 13 (24 October 1914)
The Crown, when engaged in civil litigation, is to be treated in matters of expenses exactly as a subject, and a reclaiming note by the Crown on expenses only is competent. However, the Court will not interfere with the Lord Ordinary's discretion on expenses unless there is clear error or injustice, which was not demonstrated in this case.
- Citation
- [1914] ScotLR 13
- Parties
- Pursuer and Real Raiser: Charles John Munro, judicial factor on the trust estate of the late Miss Mary Macleod of Springbank, Tobermory; Defenders: Miss Margaret Annie Busfeild and others; Defender (reclaimer): The Right Honourable Robert Munro, K.C., His Majesty's Advocate for Scotland, as representing His Majesty as ultimus hæres and His Majesty's Exchequer
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 1914
- Procedural Posture
- Multiplepoinding (civil) / Reclaiming Note (appeal) on Expenses Only
- Outcome
- Reclaiming note refused; interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Expenses, Competency of Appeal, Crown as Litigant
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles John Munro, judicial factor on the trust estate of the late Miss Mary Macleod of Springbank, Tobermory
Pursuer and Real Raiser
Miss Margaret Annie Busfeild and others
Defenders
The Right Honourable Robert Munro, K.C., His Majesty's Advocate for Scotland, as representing His Majesty as ultimus hæres and His Majesty's Exchequer
Defender (reclaimer)
Procedural Posture
Multiplepoinding (civil) / Reclaiming Note (appeal) on Expenses Only
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Crown is to be treated as a subject in matters of expenses in civil litigation
- 2 Competency of a reclaiming note by the Crown on expenses only
Ratio Decidendi
The Crown, when engaged in civil litigation, is to be treated in matters of expenses exactly as a subject, and a reclaiming note by the Crown on expenses only is competent. However, the Court will not interfere with the Lord Ordinary's discretion on expenses unless there is clear error or injustice, which was not demonstrated in this case.
Court Disposition
Reclaiming note refused; interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary affirmed.
Orders
- The interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary finding His Majesty's Advocate liable in expenses is affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment