Baillie and Others v. Motherwell Licensing Court and Others [1917] ScotLR 218 (20 January 1917)
In the special circumstances of this case, involving numerous parties and complex issues, the employment of senior counsel to revise the summons was advisable and expedient, and the associated expenses should be allowed.
- Citation
- [1917] ScotLR 218
- Parties
- Pursuers: Daniel Baillie and others; Defenders: Motherwell Licensing Court and others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 1917
- Procedural Posture
- Expenses Objection in Civil Litigation / Note of Objections to Auditor's Report
- Outcome
- Objection sustained; items taxed off by the Auditor allowed as expenses.
- Legal Topics
- Expenses, Taxation of Costs, Senior Counsel Fees
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel Baillie and others
Pursuers
Motherwell Licensing Court and others
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Expenses Objection in Civil Litigation / Note of Objections to Auditor's Report
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether charges for revision of summons by senior counsel should be allowed as expenses in the special circumstances of the case
Ratio Decidendi
In the special circumstances of this case, involving numerous parties and complex issues, the employment of senior counsel to revise the summons was advisable and expedient, and the associated expenses should be allowed.
Court Disposition
Objection sustained; items taxed off by the Auditor allowed as expenses.
Orders
- The Court allowed the items taxed off for senior counsel's revision of the summons.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment