Stuart (As Guardian To Finlayson) v. Scottish Rig Repairers & Anor [2006] ScotCS CSOH_4 (13 January 2006)

Stuart (As Guardian To Finlayson) v. Scottish Rig Repairers & Anor [2006] ScotCS CSOH_4 (13 January 2006)

The defenders failed to provide a sufficient or specific explanation for the late lodging of their account of expenses, and the delay was material in the context of the four-month time limit. The interests of justice and the purpose of the rule would not be served by excusing non-compliance in these circumstances. Accordingly, leave to lodge the account late was refused.

Citation
[2006] ScotCS CSOH_4
Parties
Pursuer: Ian Stuart as Guardian to William Finlayson; Defenders: Scottish Rig Repairers; Third Party: MacGregor Services Limited
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
13 January 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil / Motion to Allow Late Lodging of Account of Expenses
Outcome
Motion refused
Legal Topics
Expenses, Time Limits, Court Discretion, Late Lodging of Account
Civil Procedure Expenses Time Limits Court Discretion Late Lodging of Account

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ian Stuart as Guardian to William Finlayson

Pursuer

Scottish Rig Repairers

Defenders

MacGregor Services Limited

Third Party

Procedural Posture

Civil / Motion to Allow Late Lodging of Account of Expenses

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the court should grant leave for the late lodging of the defenders' account of expenses under RC 42.1(2)(aa)

Ratio Decidendi

The defenders failed to provide a sufficient or specific explanation for the late lodging of their account of expenses, and the delay was material in the context of the four-month time limit. The interests of justice and the purpose of the rule would not be served by excusing non-compliance in these circumstances. Accordingly, leave to lodge the account late was refused.

Court Disposition

Motion refused