HM Advocate on Behalf of the Slovak Republic v Havrilova [2011] ScotHC HCJAC_113 (18 November 2011)
Section 147(1) of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 does not apply to extradition proceedings under the Extradition Act 2003 because extradition is not a summary prosecution, there is no complaint or trial as defined in the Act, and the 2003 Act provides its own procedural framework and bail provisions. Section 9(2) of the 2003 Act confers procedural powers, not substantive rights such as the 40-day custody limit.
- Citation
- [2011] ScotHC HCJAC_113
- Parties
- Complainer, Respondent: Her Majesty's Advocate on behalf of the Slovak Republic; Complainer, Appellant, Respondent: Renata Havrilova
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Bills of Advocation and Appeal Under Section 147(3) of the Criminal Procedure (scotland) Act 1995 / Appeal From Sheriff Decision in Extradition Proceedings
- Outcome
- Lord Advocate's Bill of Advocation allowed; respondent's Bill of Advocation and appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Extradition Proceedings, Application of Summary Procedure Time Limits, Interpretation of Statutory Powers, Bail in Extradition Cases
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty's Advocate on behalf of the Slovak Republic
Complainer, Respondent
Renata Havrilova
Complainer, Appellant, Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bills of Advocation and Appeal Under Section 147(3) of the Criminal Procedure (scotland) Act 1995 / Appeal From Sheriff Decision in Extradition Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Does section 147(1) of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 apply to extradition proceedings under the Extradition Act 2003?
- 2 Does section 9(2) of the Extradition Act 2003 import the 40-day custody time limit from summary proceedings into extradition cases?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 147(1) of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 does not apply to extradition proceedings under the Extradition Act 2003 because extradition is not a summary prosecution, there is no complaint or trial as defined in the Act, and the 2003 Act provides its own procedural framework and bail provisions. Section 9(2) of the 2003 Act confers procedural powers, not substantive rights such as the 40-day custody limit.
Court Disposition
Lord Advocate's Bill of Advocation allowed; respondent's Bill of Advocation and appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Complaint at instance of the Lord Advocate on behalf of the Slovak Republic remitted to the Sheriff to proceed as accords.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment