Mordell v. Macandrew & Jenkins [1904] ScotLR 41_740 (07 July 1904)
Because the clerk did not delete the case from the procedure roll as required by the Act of Sederunt, the statutory condition for dismissal was not met; therefore, the reclaiming-note is refused and the action is allowed to proceed.
- Citation
- [1904] ScotLR 41_740
- Parties
- Pursuer/respondent: William Mordell; Defenders/reclaimers: Macandrew & Jenkins
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 07 July 1904
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Procedure / Reclaiming Note (appeal) Against Refusal to Dismiss Action for Procedural Default
- Outcome
- Reclaiming-note refused; action to proceed
- Legal Topics
- Failure to Lodge Prints of Closed Record, Duty of Clerk to Process, Act of Sederunt Compliance, Procedure Roll Deletion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Mordell
Pursuer/respondent
Macandrew & Jenkins
Defenders/reclaimers
Procedural Posture
Civil Procedure / Reclaiming Note (appeal) Against Refusal to Dismiss Action for Procedural Default
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether failure to lodge printed copies of the closed record within the prescribed period requires dismissal of the action
- 2 Whether the clerk's failure to delete the case from the procedure roll prejudices the defenders' right to dismissal
Ratio Decidendi
Because the clerk did not delete the case from the procedure roll as required by the Act of Sederunt, the statutory condition for dismissal was not met; therefore, the reclaiming-note is refused and the action is allowed to proceed.
Court Disposition
Reclaiming-note refused; action to proceed
Orders
- Refused the reclaiming-note
- Remitted to the Lord Ordinary to proceed with the cause
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment