INQUIRY UNDER THE FATAL ACCIDENTS AND INQUIRIES (SCOTLAND) ACT 1976 INTO THE SUDDEN DEATH OF THOMAS KILPATRICK [2009] ScotSC 100 (23 April 2009)
Death might have been avoided if the response team officer had entered the deceased's flat immediately upon arrival and summoned an ambulance, but there was no defect in the system of working that contributed to the death. Failures in management, communication, and follow-up procedures were identified as relevant to the circumstances but not causative of death.
- Citation
- [2009] ScotSC 100
- Parties
- Deceased: Thomas Kilpatrick; Procurator Fiscal Depute (for the Crown): Ms Pasportnikov; Interested Party: Fife Council
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Fatal Accident Inquiry / Determination Under Section 6(1) of the Fatal Accidents and Sudden Deaths Inquiry (scotland) Act 1976
- Outcome
- Determination under Section 6(1) of the 1976 Act; no finding of defect in system contributing to death; recommendations for improved management and procedures.
- Legal Topics
- Fatal Accident Inquiry, Sheltered Housing, Duty of Care, Emergency Response Procedures, Management of Vulnerable Tenants
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas Kilpatrick
Deceased
Ms Pasportnikov
Procurator Fiscal Depute (for the Crown)
Fife Council
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Fatal Accident Inquiry / Determination Under Section 6(1) of the Fatal Accidents and Sudden Deaths Inquiry (scotland) Act 1976
Legal Issues
- 1 Circumstances and cause of Thomas Kilpatrick's death
- 2 Whether reasonable precautions could have avoided the death
- 3 Whether defects in systems of working contributed to the death
Ratio Decidendi
Death might have been avoided if the response team officer had entered the deceased's flat immediately upon arrival and summoned an ambulance, but there was no defect in the system of working that contributed to the death. Failures in management, communication, and follow-up procedures were identified as relevant to the circumstances but not causative of death.
Court Disposition
Determination under Section 6(1) of the 1976 Act; no finding of defect in system contributing to death; recommendations for improved management and procedures.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment