Mitchell's Trustee v. Galloway's Trustees [1903] ScotLR 40_436 (06 March 1903)

Mitchell's Trustee v. Galloway's Trustees [1903] ScotLR 40_436 (06 March 1903)

The feu-charter and the letter from the superiors' agents must be read together as one contract. The trustee in bankruptcy, not being prepared to fulfil the vassal's obligation to erect buildings of the stipulated value (£5000), was not entitled to call upon the superiors to implement their obligation to allocate the feu-duty. The contract is mutual, and the trustee cannot enforce the allocation provision without offering to perform the reciprocal building obligation.

Citation
[1903] ScotLR 40_436
Parties
Pursuer/respondent: Mitchell's Trustee; Defenders/reclaimers: Galloway's Trustees
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
06 March 1903
Procedural Posture
Civil (contract/property) / Appeal (inner House, First Division)
Outcome
Appeal allowed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled; defenders assoilzied (absolved) from the conclusions of the action.
Legal Topics
Feu Contract, Mutual Obligations, Obligation to Build, Allocation of Feu Duty, Bankruptcy and Trustee Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mitchell's Trustee

Pursuer/respondent

Galloway's Trustees

Defenders/reclaimers

Procedural Posture

Civil (contract/property) / Appeal (inner House, First Division)

  1. 1 Whether the trustee in bankruptcy is entitled to enforce the superiors' obligation to allocate feu-duty when the trustee has not fulfilled the vassal's reciprocal obligation to erect buildings of the stipulated value.
  2. 2 Whether the letter from the superiors' agents constituted an independent binding obligation to allocate feu-duty upon completion of a specific building, regardless of the overall building obligation in the feu-charter.

Ratio Decidendi

The feu-charter and the letter from the superiors' agents must be read together as one contract. The trustee in bankruptcy, not being prepared to fulfil the vassal's obligation to erect buildings of the stipulated value (£5000), was not entitled to call upon the superiors to implement their obligation to allocate the feu-duty. The contract is mutual, and the trustee cannot enforce the allocation provision without offering to perform the reciprocal building obligation.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled; defenders assoilzied (absolved) from the conclusions of the action.

Orders

  • Recall of the Lord Ordinary's interlocutor granting declarator and damages.
  • Decree of absolvitor (dismissal) in favour of defenders.