Mitchell's Trustee v. Galloway's Trustees [1903] ScotLR 40_436 (06 March 1903)
The feu-charter and the letter from the superiors' agents must be read together as one contract. The trustee in bankruptcy, not being prepared to fulfil the vassal's obligation to erect buildings of the stipulated value (£5000), was not entitled to call upon the superiors to implement their obligation to allocate the feu-duty. The contract is mutual, and the trustee cannot enforce the allocation provision without offering to perform the reciprocal building obligation.
- Citation
- [1903] ScotLR 40_436
- Parties
- Pursuer/respondent: Mitchell's Trustee; Defenders/reclaimers: Galloway's Trustees
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 1903
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (contract/property) / Appeal (inner House, First Division)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled; defenders assoilzied (absolved) from the conclusions of the action.
- Legal Topics
- Feu Contract, Mutual Obligations, Obligation to Build, Allocation of Feu Duty, Bankruptcy and Trustee Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mitchell's Trustee
Pursuer/respondent
Galloway's Trustees
Defenders/reclaimers
Procedural Posture
Civil (contract/property) / Appeal (inner House, First Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trustee in bankruptcy is entitled to enforce the superiors' obligation to allocate feu-duty when the trustee has not fulfilled the vassal's reciprocal obligation to erect buildings of the stipulated value.
- 2 Whether the letter from the superiors' agents constituted an independent binding obligation to allocate feu-duty upon completion of a specific building, regardless of the overall building obligation in the feu-charter.
Ratio Decidendi
The feu-charter and the letter from the superiors' agents must be read together as one contract. The trustee in bankruptcy, not being prepared to fulfil the vassal's obligation to erect buildings of the stipulated value (£5000), was not entitled to call upon the superiors to implement their obligation to allocate the feu-duty. The contract is mutual, and the trustee cannot enforce the allocation provision without offering to perform the reciprocal building obligation.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled; defenders assoilzied (absolved) from the conclusions of the action.
Orders
- Recall of the Lord Ordinary's interlocutor granting declarator and damages.
- Decree of absolvitor (dismissal) in favour of defenders.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment