Montgomerie-Fleming's Trustees v. Kennedy [1912] ScotLR 925 (13 July 1912)
The feu-contract clause requiring the property to be 'occupied as self-contained lodgings' is a real burden restricting occupation to that use. Conversion of the basement into a cabinetmaking or upholstery business constitutes a contravention of this restriction.
- Citation
- [1912] ScotLR 925
- Parties
- Pursuer: Hugh Tennant, Holland House, West Kilbride, and others, trustees acting under the trust-disposition and settlement of the late James Brown Montgomerie-Fleming, of Kelvinside, Glasgow; Defender: Alexander Kennedy, cabinetmaker and upholsterer, Byres Road, Hillhead, Glasgow
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 1912
- Procedural Posture
- Action of Declarator and Interdict / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary to Inner House, First Division
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled; declarator and interdict granted in restricted terms
- Legal Topics
- Feu Contract, Real Burdens, Restrictions on Use, Self Contained Lodging, Interpretation of Title Deeds
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hugh Tennant, Holland House, West Kilbride, and others, trustees acting under the trust-disposition and settlement of the late James Brown Montgomerie-Fleming, of Kelvinside, Glasgow
Pursuer
Alexander Kennedy, cabinetmaker and upholsterer, Byres Road, Hillhead, Glasgow
Defender
Procedural Posture
Action of Declarator and Interdict / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary to Inner House, First Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the feu-contract prohibits occupation of the premises otherwise than as a self-contained lodging
- 2 Whether conversion of the basement into a cabinetmaking or upholstery business breaches the feu-contract
Ratio Decidendi
The feu-contract clause requiring the property to be 'occupied as self-contained lodgings' is a real burden restricting occupation to that use. Conversion of the basement into a cabinetmaking or upholstery business constitutes a contravention of this restriction.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled; declarator and interdict granted in restricted terms
Orders
- Found and declared that the defender is not entitled to occupy the self-contained lodging otherwise than as a self-contained lodging
- Interdicted, prohibited, and discharged the defender from occupying the basement floor for the purpose of a cabinetmaking or upholstery business
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment