Heriot's Trust v. Caledonian Railway Co. [1914] ScotLR 478 (27 March 1914)
The defenders did not acquire a statutory title under section 80 of the 1845 Act because the conveyance was not registered within sixty days. Therefore, the feudal relationship persisted, and the pursuers, as superiors, were entitled to payment of the casualty (composition) as claimed. Even if the title was statutory, the obligation to pay feudal charges remained until redemption under section 107.
- Citation
- [1914] ScotLR 478
- Parties
- Pursuer: Governors of George Heriot's Trust; Defender: Caledonian Railway Company
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 1914
- Procedural Posture
- Petitory Action for Payment of Casualty (composition) / Inner House, First Division, Appeal From Lord Ordinary
- Outcome
- Pursuers entitled to payment of the casualty; Lord Ordinary's interlocutor affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Feudal Superiority, Casualty of Composition, Statutory Title Under Lands Clauses Consolidation (scotland) Act 1845, Registration of Conveyances, Railway Company Land Acquisition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Governors of George Heriot's Trust
Pursuer
Caledonian Railway Company
Defender
Procedural Posture
Petitory Action for Payment of Casualty (composition) / Inner House, First Division, Appeal From Lord Ordinary
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defenders acquired a statutory title under section 80 of the Lands Clauses Consolidation (Scotland) Act 1845, extinguishing the pursuers' rights of superiority and liability for casualties.
- 2 Whether failure to register the conveyance within sixty days precluded the creation of a statutory title.
- 3 Whether the pursuers are entitled to payment of the casualty (composition) under the feudal relationship.
Ratio Decidendi
The defenders did not acquire a statutory title under section 80 of the 1845 Act because the conveyance was not registered within sixty days. Therefore, the feudal relationship persisted, and the pursuers, as superiors, were entitled to payment of the casualty (composition) as claimed. Even if the title was statutory, the obligation to pay feudal charges remained until redemption under section 107.
Court Disposition
Pursuers entitled to payment of the casualty; Lord Ordinary's interlocutor affirmed.
Orders
- Repel defenders' pleas-in-law 1-4; sustain pursuers' plea; allow proof as to amount of composition; affirm Lord Ordinary's interlocutor.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment