McDonald v Flockhart Moffat Newton or Mcdonald [2015] ScotCS CSIH_61 (11 August 2015)
The majority held that 'period of membership' in regulation 4 of the 2000 Regulations should be construed as 'active membership' only, i.e., the period during which the party was contributing to the pension scheme and acquiring value, not including periods of deferred or pensioner membership. This interpretation aligns with the statutory focus on assets acquired during the marriage and avoids including value not attributable to contributions made during the marriage. The appeal was refused, upholding the sheriff's decision to limit the matrimonial property portion of the pension to the period of active membership during the marriage.
- Citation
- [2015] ScotCS CSIH_61
- Parties
- Pursuer and Respondent: Thomas Clark McDonald; Defender and Appellant: Annie Flockhart Moffat Newton or McDonald
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 11 August 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment of the Inner House, Court of Session
- Outcome
- Appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Financial Provision on Divorce, Pension Sharing Orders, Matrimonial Property, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas Clark McDonald
Pursuer and Respondent
Annie Flockhart Moffat Newton or McDonald
Defender and Appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment of the Inner House, Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 What proportion of the value of the husband's pension rights is referable to the period of marriage before separation for the purposes of a pension sharing order under the Family Law (Scotland) Act 1985?
- 2 How should 'period of membership' in regulation 4 of the Divorce etc. (Pensions) (Scotland) Regulations 2000 be interpreted for apportionment of pension value?
Ratio Decidendi
The majority held that 'period of membership' in regulation 4 of the 2000 Regulations should be construed as 'active membership' only, i.e., the period during which the party was contributing to the pension scheme and acquiring value, not including periods of deferred or pensioner membership. This interpretation aligns with the statutory focus on assets acquired during the marriage and avoids including value not attributable to contributions made during the marriage. The appeal was refused, upholding the sheriff's decision to limit the matrimonial property portion of the pension to the period of active membership during the marriage.
Court Disposition
Appeal refused
Orders
- Sheriff's decision upheld; pension value referable to active membership during marriage only to be included as matrimonial property.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment