D AGAINST D [2021] ScotCS CSOH_66 (23 June 2021)
The pursuer gave clear instructions to settle, had capacity, and was fully functioning and engaged. No evidential basis for duress or lack of capacity was established. The compromise was reasonable and rational, and section 16 was not engaged. The settlement is valid and binding.
- Citation
- [2021] ScotCS CSOH_66
- Parties
- Pursuer: D; Defender: D
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Financial Provision on Divorce / Preliminary Proof on Validity and Fairness of Settlement
- Outcome
- Settlement declared valid and binding; pursuer's plea repelled; defender's plea sustained; decree of declarator pronounced for defender; divorce not yet disposed.
- Legal Topics
- Financial Provision on Divorce, Settlement Validity, Duress, Capacity, Section 16 Family Law (scotland) Act 1985
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D
Pursuer
D
Defender
Procedural Posture
Financial Provision on Divorce / Preliminary Proof on Validity and Fairness of Settlement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the compromise reached in October 2020 constituted a valid and binding agreement
- 2 Whether the agreement should be set aside for unfairness or unreasonableness under section 16 of the Family Law (Scotland) Act 1985
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer gave clear instructions to settle, had capacity, and was fully functioning and engaged. No evidential basis for duress or lack of capacity was established. The compromise was reasonable and rational, and section 16 was not engaged. The settlement is valid and binding.
Court Disposition
Settlement declared valid and binding; pursuer's plea repelled; defender's plea sustained; decree of declarator pronounced for defender; divorce not yet disposed.
Orders
- Parties to be heard by order for final disposal of divorce; written submissions required one week prior to hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment