Hannah's Trustees v. Hannah [1924] ScotLR 373 (13 March 1924)
The forfeiture clause is inoperative as there are no beneficiaries who accepted the settlement; thus, the trust estate does not fall into intestacy but remains protected for the issue of the children, pending the period of division.
- Citation
- [1924] ScotLR 373
- Parties
- First Parties: Mrs Mary Isabella Brown or Hannah and others (testamentary trustees of James Hannah); Second Party: Hector Hannah; Second Party: Andrew Brown Hannah; Third Party: Olive Hannah
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 1924
- Procedural Posture
- Special Case (court of Session, Inner House, First Division) / Judgment on Legal Question Regarding Trust Estate Distribution
- Outcome
- Question of law answered in the negative; the trustees are not bound to denude themselves of the balance of the trust estate in favour of the sons as heirs ab intestato.
- Legal Topics
- Forfeiture Clause, Legal Rights in Succession, Approbate and Reprobate, Intestacy, Vesting of Estate
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Mary Isabella Brown or Hannah and others (testamentary trustees of James Hannah)
First Parties
Hector Hannah
Second Party
Andrew Brown Hannah
Second Party
Olive Hannah
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Special Case (court of Session, Inner House, First Division) / Judgment on Legal Question Regarding Trust Estate Distribution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the forfeiture clause in the testator's settlement operates when all primary beneficiaries have repudiated their provisions and claimed legal rights
- 2 Whether the remainder of the trust estate falls into intestacy or is protected for the issue of the children
Ratio Decidendi
The forfeiture clause is inoperative as there are no beneficiaries who accepted the settlement; thus, the trust estate does not fall into intestacy but remains protected for the issue of the children, pending the period of division.
Court Disposition
Question of law answered in the negative; the trustees are not bound to denude themselves of the balance of the trust estate in favour of the sons as heirs ab intestato.
Orders
- Trustees to retain the balance of the trust estate pending the period of division and to protect the rights of the issue of the children.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment