WS Karoulias SA v. The Drambuie Liqueur Company Ltd [2005] ScotCS CSOH_112 (17 August 2005)

WS Karoulias SA v. The Drambuie Liqueur Company Ltd [2005] ScotCS CSOH_112 (17 August 2005)

The court held that, on the facts and evidence, the parties did not intend to be legally bound until the distributorship agreement was formally executed by both parties. The prior course of dealing, the inclusion of a testing clause, and the communications requesting signed copies demonstrated that signature was a condition precedent to contract formation. Accordingly, no binding five-year agreement was concluded on 5 February 2003.

Citation
[2005] ScotCS CSOH_112
Parties
Pursuer: W S Karoulias SA; Defender: The Drambuie Liqueur Company Limited
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
17 August 2005
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / Outer House, Court of Session, Proof Before Answer
Outcome
Action dismissed
Legal Topics
Formation of Contract, Enforceability of Unsigned Agreements, Distribution Agreements, Termination of Contract, Business Relationships
Contract Law Commercial Law Formation of Contract Enforceability of Unsigned Agreements Distribution Agreements Termination of Contract Business Relationships

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

W S Karoulias SA

Pursuer

The Drambuie Liqueur Company Limited

Defender

Procedural Posture

Commercial Contract Dispute / Outer House, Court of Session, Proof Before Answer

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a binding and legally enforceable distributorship agreement was concluded between the parties on 5 February 2003
  2. 2 Whether the absence of signatures on the draft agreement prevented contract formation
  3. 3 Whether conduct and communications between the parties evidenced intention to be bound

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that, on the facts and evidence, the parties did not intend to be legally bound until the distributorship agreement was formally executed by both parties. The prior course of dealing, the inclusion of a testing clause, and the communications requesting signed copies demonstrated that signature was a condition precedent to contract formation. Accordingly, no binding five-year agreement was concluded on 5 February 2003.

Court Disposition

Action dismissed

Orders

  • The pursuer's claim is dismissed.