Burnside Kemp Fraser & Ors v Clark Or Campbell & Others [1999] ScotCS 208 (31 August 1999)

Burnside Kemp Fraser & Ors v Clark Or Campbell & Others [1999] ScotCS 208 (31 August 1999)

For the reasons given in the Opinions in Burnside Kemp Fraser v Parker and Burnside Kemp Fraser v Robb, the defenders' second plea-in-law is repelled and their third plea-in-law is sustained to the extent of excluding from probation the pursuers' averments in article 4 of the condescendence from 'All of the Solicitors' to 'enter into the foregoing agreement'.

Citation
[1999] ScotCS 208
Parties
Pursuers: Burnside Kemp Fraser and Others; Defenders: Mrs Alice Clark or Campbell and Others
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
31 August 1999
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory (pleadings and Relevancy)
Outcome
Defenders' second plea-in-law repelled; third plea-in-law sustained in part; certain averments excluded from probation; case to be put out By Order for further discussion.
Legal Topics
Forum Non Conveniens, Pleadings, Probation, Exclusion of Averments

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Burnside Kemp Fraser and Others

Pursuers

Mrs Alice Clark or Campbell and Others

Defenders

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory (pleadings and Relevancy)

  1. 1 Whether the plea of forum non conveniens should be sustained
  2. 2 Whether certain averments in the pursuers' pleadings should be excluded from probation

Ratio Decidendi

For the reasons given in the Opinions in Burnside Kemp Fraser v Parker and Burnside Kemp Fraser v Robb, the defenders' second plea-in-law is repelled and their third plea-in-law is sustained to the extent of excluding from probation the pursuers' averments in article 4 of the condescendence from 'All of the Solicitors' to 'enter into the foregoing agreement'.

Court Disposition

Defenders' second plea-in-law repelled; third plea-in-law sustained in part; certain averments excluded from probation; case to be put out By Order for further discussion.

Orders

  • Exclusion from probation of pursuers' averments in article 4 of the condescendence from 'All of the Solicitors' to 'enter into the foregoing agreement'
  • Case to be put out By Order for further discussion