Burnside Kemp Fraser & Ors v Murphy Or Young & Ors [1999] ScotCS 211 (31 August 1999)
The court repelled the defenders' plea of forum non conveniens, accepted by concession the plea of lis alibi pendens, and excluded from probation certain averments as specified.
- Citation
- [1999] ScotCS 211
- Parties
- Pursuers: Burnside Kemp Fraser and Others; Defenders: Mrs Martha Sarah Murphy or Young and Others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 31 August 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory (pleas in Law Considered)
- Outcome
- Defenders' second plea-in-law (forum non conveniens) repelled; first plea-in-law (lis alibi pendens) repelled by concession; third plea-in-law sustained to extent of excluding specified averments from probation; case to be put out By Order for further discussion.
- Legal Topics
- Forum Non Conveniens, Lis Alibi Pendens, Probation of Averments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Burnside Kemp Fraser and Others
Pursuers
Mrs Martha Sarah Murphy or Young and Others
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory (pleas in Law Considered)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Scottish court is the appropriate forum (forum non conveniens)
- 2 Whether there is a pending action elsewhere (lis alibi pendens)
- 3 Whether certain averments should be excluded from probation
Ratio Decidendi
The court repelled the defenders' plea of forum non conveniens, accepted by concession the plea of lis alibi pendens, and excluded from probation certain averments as specified.
Court Disposition
Defenders' second plea-in-law (forum non conveniens) repelled; first plea-in-law (lis alibi pendens) repelled by concession; third plea-in-law sustained to extent of excluding specified averments from probation; case to be put out By Order for further discussion.
Orders
- Repel defenders' second plea-in-law (forum non conveniens)
- Repel defenders' first plea-in-law (lis alibi pendens) by concession
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment