Henderson v. Foxworth Investments Ltd [2011] ScotCS CSOH_66 (12 April 2011)

Henderson v. Foxworth Investments Ltd [2011] ScotCS CSOH_66 (12 April 2011)

Foxworth, through Mr Liu as its directing mind, had full knowledge of the circumstances of the disposition from LGDC to NSL, including the company's insolvency and the challengeable nature of NSL's title. The pursuer failed to establish that Foxworth's rights under the standard security were not acquired in good faith and for value. The standard security is not void on the grounds advanced, and the pursuer's challenge to the authenticity of documents and adequacy of consideration was not substantiated.

Citation
[2011] ScotCS CSOH_66
Parties
Pursuer: Matthew Purdon Henderson; First Defender: Foxworth Investments Limited; Second Defender: 3052775 Nova Scotia Limited
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
12 April 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Reduction / Judgment After Proof
Outcome
Action dismissed
Legal Topics
Gratuitous Alienation, Fraudulent Preference, Unfair Preference, Standard Security, Reduction, Good Faith Acquisition, Burden of Proof
Insolvency Property Law Company Law Gratuitous Alienation Fraudulent Preference Unfair Preference Standard Security Reduction +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Matthew Purdon Henderson

Pursuer

Foxworth Investments Limited

First Defender

3052775 Nova Scotia Limited

Second Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil Reduction / Judgment After Proof

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the standard security granted by NSL in favour of Foxworth is void and unenforceable
  2. 2 Whether Foxworth acquired rights under the standard security for value and in good faith
  3. 3 Whether the disposition from LGDC to NSL was for adequate consideration

Ratio Decidendi

Foxworth, through Mr Liu as its directing mind, had full knowledge of the circumstances of the disposition from LGDC to NSL, including the company's insolvency and the challengeable nature of NSL's title. The pursuer failed to establish that Foxworth's rights under the standard security were not acquired in good faith and for value. The standard security is not void on the grounds advanced, and the pursuer's challenge to the authenticity of documents and adequacy of consideration was not substantiated.

Court Disposition

Action dismissed

Orders

  • No reduction of the standard security
  • No declarator that the standard security is void