G. v. S. [2006] ScotCS CSOH_88 (06 June 2006)
An action of harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 does not qualify as a personal injuries action for the purposes of Chapter 43 procedure, as damages for anxiety are only competent by statutory provision and do not meet the ordinary definition of personal injuries. The case should proceed as an ordinary action.
- Citation
- [2006] ScotCS CSOH_88
- Parties
- Pursuer: G; Defender: S
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Action of Harassment (personal Injuries Action) / Motion to Withdraw From Chapter 43 Procedure and Proceed as Ordinary Action
- Outcome
- Motion granted; case withdrawn from Chapter 43 procedure and allowed to proceed as ordinary action.
- Legal Topics
- Harassment, Personal Injuries, Damages, Court Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
G
Pursuer
S
Defender
Procedural Posture
Action of Harassment (personal Injuries Action) / Motion to Withdraw From Chapter 43 Procedure and Proceed as Ordinary Action
Legal Issues
- 1 Does an action of harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 qualify as a personal injuries action for Chapter 43 procedure?
- 2 Should the case proceed under Chapter 43 or ordinary procedure?
Ratio Decidendi
An action of harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 does not qualify as a personal injuries action for the purposes of Chapter 43 procedure, as damages for anxiety are only competent by statutory provision and do not meet the ordinary definition of personal injuries. The case should proceed as an ordinary action.
Court Disposition
Motion granted; case withdrawn from Chapter 43 procedure and allowed to proceed as ordinary action.
Orders
- Open record to be lodged within four weeks of the date of this decision.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment