Gallacher (AP) v Stirling Council For Judicial Review [2000] ScotCS 116 (2 May 2000)
Stirling Council's de facto policy for allocating housing to homeless applicants was invalid because it was not published as required by section 21 of the Housing (Scotland) Act 1987. Any decision made in reliance on unpublished elements of the policy is likewise invalid.
- Citation
- [2000] ScotCS 116
- Parties
- Petitioner: Hazel Gallacher (AP); Respondents: Stirling Council
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 02 May 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Outer House, Court of Session, Opinion
- Outcome
- Petition sustained in part; declarator and reduction granted.
- Legal Topics
- Homelessness, Local Authority Housing Allocation, Statutory Interpretation, Policy Publication Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hazel Gallacher (AP)
Petitioner
Stirling Council
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Outer House, Court of Session, Opinion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Stirling Council's de facto policy for allocating housing to homeless applicants is invalid for lack of publication under section 21 of the Housing (Scotland) Act 1987
- 2 Whether the policy unlawfully fetters discretion or is unduly rigid
- 3 Whether the policy unlawfully discriminates against certain homeless applicants
Ratio Decidendi
Stirling Council's de facto policy for allocating housing to homeless applicants was invalid because it was not published as required by section 21 of the Housing (Scotland) Act 1987. Any decision made in reliance on unpublished elements of the policy is likewise invalid.
Court Disposition
Petition sustained in part; declarator and reduction granted.
Orders
- Declarator that the respondents' de facto policy is invalid for want of publication under section 21 of the Housing (Scotland) Act 1987.
- Reduction of the decision of 7 December 1998 allocating accommodation to the petitioner under the invalid policy.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment