Rispond Estate & Ors v. Mainstream Scotland Ltd [2005] ScotCS CSOH_129 (29 September 2005)
No binding substitute agreement was reached for supply of fry in July 2003; no implied obligation existed for defenders to accept smolts below minimum weight or reimburse ova and vaccine costs; each year's contract was separately negotiated and no express or implied terms carried over.
- Citation
- [2005] ScotCS CSOH_129
- Parties
- Pursuers: Rispond Estate and Others; Defenders: Mainstream Scotland Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Action / Proof Before Answer
- Outcome
- Decree of absolvitor granted; pursuers' claims dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Implied Terms, Course of Dealing, Supply of Goods, Contractual Obligations, Variation of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rispond Estate and Others
Pursuers
Mainstream Scotland Limited
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Commercial Action / Proof Before Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a binding agreement for supply of fry in July 2003
- 2 Whether the defenders were obliged to accept smolts below the agreed minimum weight
- 3 Whether the defenders were obliged to reimburse the pursuers for ova and vaccine costs
Ratio Decidendi
No binding substitute agreement was reached for supply of fry in July 2003; no implied obligation existed for defenders to accept smolts below minimum weight or reimburse ova and vaccine costs; each year's contract was separately negotiated and no express or implied terms carried over.
Court Disposition
Decree of absolvitor granted; pursuers' claims dismissed
Orders
- Repel pursuers' plea-in-law
- Pronounce decree of absolvitor
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment