Lord Advocate v. Magistrates of Edinburgh [1905] ScotLR 42_691 (06 July 1905)
A municipal corporation that fails to deduct income-tax from interest payments as required by statute remains liable to the Crown for the amount that should have been deducted; the statutory duty creates a direct debt recoverable by the Crown.
- Citation
- [1905] ScotLR 42_691
- Parties
- Pursuer and Respondent: Lord Advocate; Defenders and Reclaimers: Lord Provost, Magistrates, and Council of the city of Edinburgh
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 06 July 1905
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Outer House to Inner House
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; decree for pursuer affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Deduction of Income Tax, Municipal Liability, Customs and Inland Revenue Act 1888
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lord Advocate
Pursuer and Respondent
Lord Provost, Magistrates, and Council of the city of Edinburgh
Defenders and Reclaimers
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Outer House to Inner House
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a municipal corporation is liable to pay income-tax it failed to deduct from interest payments under section 24(3) of the Customs and Inland Revenue Act 1888
- 2 Whether failure to deduct and account for income-tax relieves the corporation of liability to the Crown
Ratio Decidendi
A municipal corporation that fails to deduct income-tax from interest payments as required by statute remains liable to the Crown for the amount that should have been deducted; the statutory duty creates a direct debt recoverable by the Crown.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; decree for pursuer affirmed
Orders
- Decree for payment of £12, 19s. to the Crown by the defenders
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment