Gardner v MacNeal [2000] ScotCS 285 (14 November 2000)

Gardner v MacNeal [2000] ScotCS 285 (14 November 2000)

There is no relevant basis to justify the making of an order to undo works already completed, as the defender no longer has authority, the works are finished, and the order sought is neither clear nor specific. The action is therefore dismissed.

Citation
[2000] ScotCS 285
Parties
Pursuer and Appellant: Thomas Gardner; Defender and Respondent: Lorn MacNeal
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
14 November 2000
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Sheriff Court (interdict and Related Remedies) / Appeal to Inner House, Court of Session
Outcome
Appeal refused; action dismissed.
Legal Topics
Interdict, Common Property Repairs, Authority of Agent, Housing (scotland) Act 1987, Remedies for Unauthorised Works

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thomas Gardner

Pursuer and Appellant

Lorn MacNeal

Defender and Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Sheriff Court (interdict and Related Remedies) / Appeal to Inner House, Court of Session

  1. 1 Whether defender acted beyond authority in instructing works without appellant's consent
  2. 2 Whether works exceeded statutory notice requirements
  3. 3 Whether court can order works to be undone after completion

Ratio Decidendi

There is no relevant basis to justify the making of an order to undo works already completed, as the defender no longer has authority, the works are finished, and the order sought is neither clear nor specific. The action is therefore dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal refused; action dismissed.