Gardner v MacNeal [2000] ScotCS 285 (14 November 2000)
There is no relevant basis to justify the making of an order to undo works already completed, as the defender no longer has authority, the works are finished, and the order sought is neither clear nor specific. The action is therefore dismissed.
- Citation
- [2000] ScotCS 285
- Parties
- Pursuer and Appellant: Thomas Gardner; Defender and Respondent: Lorn MacNeal
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Sheriff Court (interdict and Related Remedies) / Appeal to Inner House, Court of Session
- Outcome
- Appeal refused; action dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Interdict, Common Property Repairs, Authority of Agent, Housing (scotland) Act 1987, Remedies for Unauthorised Works
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas Gardner
Pursuer and Appellant
Lorn MacNeal
Defender and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Sheriff Court (interdict and Related Remedies) / Appeal to Inner House, Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defender acted beyond authority in instructing works without appellant's consent
- 2 Whether works exceeded statutory notice requirements
- 3 Whether court can order works to be undone after completion
Ratio Decidendi
There is no relevant basis to justify the making of an order to undo works already completed, as the defender no longer has authority, the works are finished, and the order sought is neither clear nor specific. The action is therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal refused; action dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment