William Collins & Sons Ltd v CGU Insurance Plc [2006] ScotCS CSOH_87 (02 June 2006)
The pursuers are entitled to interim orders for access to carry out repairs because the lease and head lease, read together, give them the unqualified right to enter for necessary repairs, and the pursuers are the sole judges of necessity. The arbitration clause does not oust the court's jurisdiction to grant interim orders. The order sought is not final, is sufficiently precise, and the balance of convenience favours the pursuers given their contractual obligations and the inadequacy of damages as a remedy.
- Citation
- [2006] ScotCS CSOH_87
- Parties
- Pursuer: William Collins & Sons Limited; Defender: CGU Insurance Plc
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 02 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Motion for Interim Orders (commercial Lease Dispute) / Interim Motion Hearing Before Defences Lodged
- Outcome
- Interim orders for access granted in favour of the pursuers; expenses awarded to pursuers.
- Legal Topics
- Interim Orders, Right of Access for Repairs, Lease Obligations, Balance of Convenience, Arbitration Clauses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Collins & Sons Limited
Pursuer
CGU Insurance Plc
Defender
Procedural Posture
Motion for Interim Orders (commercial Lease Dispute) / Interim Motion Hearing Before Defences Lodged
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuers are entitled to interim orders granting access to leased premises for repairs under the terms of the lease and head lease
- 2 Whether the pursuers are the sole judges of necessity for repairs under the lease
- 3 Whether the arbitration clause ousts the court's jurisdiction to grant interim orders
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuers are entitled to interim orders for access to carry out repairs because the lease and head lease, read together, give them the unqualified right to enter for necessary repairs, and the pursuers are the sole judges of necessity. The arbitration clause does not oust the court's jurisdiction to grant interim orders. The order sought is not final, is sufficiently precise, and the balance of convenience favours the pursuers given their contractual obligations and the inadequacy of damages as a remedy.
Court Disposition
Interim orders for access granted in favour of the pursuers; expenses awarded to pursuers.
Orders
- Pursuers granted interim orders for access to premises to carry out necessary repairs as per lease terms.
- Defenders to pay expenses.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment