3052775 Nova Scotia Ltd v Henderson [2006] ScotCS CSOH_147 (19 September 2006)
The pursuers' right to possession is valid in a question with the defender pending registration and reduction, but the balance of convenience, including the defender's prima facie case under section 242, preservation of the business, and lack of funds for damages, favours maintaining the status quo and refusing interim possession.
- Citation
- [2006] ScotCS CSOH_147
- Parties
- Pursuer: 3052775 Nova Scotia Limited; Defender: Matthew Purdon Henderson
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 19 September 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Motion for Interim Order / Interim Application Under Section 47(2) of the Court of Session Act 1988
- Outcome
- Motion refused
- Legal Topics
- Interim Possession, Voidable Disposition, Liquidation, Balance of Convenience
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
3052775 Nova Scotia Limited
Pursuer
Matthew Purdon Henderson
Defender
Procedural Posture
Motion for Interim Order / Interim Application Under Section 47(2) of the Court of Session Act 1988
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether pursuers are entitled to interim possession of heritable subjects pending outcome of section 242 challenge
- 2 Nature of pursuers' right to possession prior to registration
- 3 Balance of convenience between parties
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuers' right to possession is valid in a question with the defender pending registration and reduction, but the balance of convenience, including the defender's prima facie case under section 242, preservation of the business, and lack of funds for damages, favours maintaining the status quo and refusing interim possession.
Court Disposition
Motion refused
Orders
- Pursuers' motion for interim possession of Letham Grange refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment