JOHN FRASER TAIT AGAINST RGM SOLICITORS & Ors [2015] ScotSC 50 (30 June 2015)
Clause 7.1 of the Partnership Agreement, properly construed, entitles the pursuer to a fixed annual payment of £36,000 irrespective of the firm's profitability and does not impose liability for losses; contextual background and commercial sense support this interpretation.
- Citation
- [2015] ScotSC 50
- Parties
- Pursuer: John Fraser Tait; Defenders: RGM Solicitors & Others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal refused; sheriff's interlocutors adhered to.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Partnership Agreement, Fixed Remuneration Vs Profit Share, Liability for Losses, Commercial Construction of Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Fraser Tait
Pursuer
RGM Solicitors & Others
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper construction of clause 7.1 of Partnership Agreement
- 2 Whether pursuer entitled to fixed payment irrespective of profits
- 3 Whether pursuer liable for losses of the firm
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 7.1 of the Partnership Agreement, properly construed, entitles the pursuer to a fixed annual payment of £36,000 irrespective of the firm's profitability and does not impose liability for losses; contextual background and commercial sense support this interpretation.
Court Disposition
Appeal refused; sheriff's interlocutors adhered to.
Orders
- Defenders liable to pursuer in expenses of appeal.
- Account of expenses to be given in and remitted to auditor of court to tax and report.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment