City Link Development Company Ltd v. Lanarkshire Housing Association Ltd [2005] ScotCS CSOH_76 (16 June 2005)
The court held that the minute of agreement was intended to operate as an over-arching contract governing the entire project, including the entitlement to indexation for works carried out more than two years after the Phase 1 contract. The absence of an indexation clause in the Phase 2 and 3 contracts did not supersede the pursuers' entitlement under the minute of agreement. Alternatively, the contracts should be rectified to reflect the parties' true agreement regarding indexation.
- Citation
- [2005] ScotCS CSOH_76
- Parties
- Pursuer: City Link Development Company Limited; Defender: Lanarkshire Housing Association Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract Dispute / First Instance Judgment
- Outcome
- Declarator granted in favour of the pursuers; alternatively, rectification ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Contracts, Rectification, Building Contracts, Indexation Clauses, Declarator, Law Reform (miscellaneous Provisions) (scotland) Act 1985
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
City Link Development Company Limited
Pursuer
Lanarkshire Housing Association Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / First Instance Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuers are entitled to indexation of the contract sum for works undertaken more than two years after the Phase 1 contract under clause 1.1.3 of the minute of agreement
- 2 Whether the Phase 2 and Phase 3 contracts should be rectified to include an indexation provision in accordance with the parties' agreement
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the minute of agreement was intended to operate as an over-arching contract governing the entire project, including the entitlement to indexation for works carried out more than two years after the Phase 1 contract. The absence of an indexation clause in the Phase 2 and 3 contracts did not supersede the pursuers' entitlement under the minute of agreement. Alternatively, the contracts should be rectified to reflect the parties' true agreement regarding indexation.
Court Disposition
Declarator granted in favour of the pursuers; alternatively, rectification ordered.
Orders
- The pursuers are entitled to have the contract sum in the Phase 2 and Phase 3 contracts adjusted in accordance with the Tender Prices Index for works undertaken after 4 August 2000.
- Rectification of the Phase 2 and Phase 3 contracts to include the agreed indexation provision.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment