Green v Gill & Ors [1999] ScotCS 233 (8 October 1999)
Only expenses directly related to the realisation of the pursuer's Certificate are deductible under Clause (TEN) of the Syndicate Agreement. Expenses related to disciplinary proceedings, general syndicate costs, or unrelated legal actions are not deductible from the proceeds of sale of the pursuer's entitlement. The pursuer's averments regarding the adequacy of the price obtained for the Certificate are relevant and should be remitted to proof.
- Citation
- [1999] ScotCS 233
- Parties
- Pursuer: Anthony D. Green; Defenders: John Gill and Others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 08 October 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Procedure Roll Debate on Objections to Account of Intromissions and Interpretation of Contract
- Outcome
- Proof before answer allowed on the pursuer's objections to the account of intromissions, with certain averments excluded from probation.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Contractual Clauses, Deduction of Expenses, Obligations of Trustees, Expulsion From Syndicate, Accounting and Reckoning
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony D. Green
Pursuer
John Gill and Others
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Civil / Procedure Roll Debate on Objections to Account of Intromissions and Interpretation of Contract
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether certain expenses are deductible from the proceeds of sale of the pursuer's entitlement under Clause (TEN) of the Syndicate Agreement
- 2 Whether the defenders endeavoured to obtain the best possible price for the pursuer's Certificate
Ratio Decidendi
Only expenses directly related to the realisation of the pursuer's Certificate are deductible under Clause (TEN) of the Syndicate Agreement. Expenses related to disciplinary proceedings, general syndicate costs, or unrelated legal actions are not deductible from the proceeds of sale of the pursuer's entitlement. The pursuer's averments regarding the adequacy of the price obtained for the Certificate are relevant and should be remitted to proof.
Court Disposition
Proof before answer allowed on the pursuer's objections to the account of intromissions, with certain averments excluded from probation.
Orders
- Sustain plea-in-law 2 and 4 for the pursuer to the extent of excluding from probation the defenders' averments supporting deductions in items 1, 3, 4, and 6 of the Schedule to the account of intromissions.
- Repel plea-in-law 2 of the defenders related to their answers to the objections.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment