Young v. Hill [1902] ScotLR 39_415 (05 March 1902)
A room equipped with features such as a fireplace and window, and structurally adapted for habitation, is a 'habitable room' under the Act, regardless of the proprietor's stated intention for its use. Statutory requirements must be met based on the objective characteristics of the room as shown in the plans.
- Citation
- [1902] ScotLR 39_415
- Parties
- Appellant (master of Works): John Young; Respondent (petitioner/proprietor): Samuel Hill
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 05 March 1902
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Dean of Guild Court Decision / First Division, Inner House, Court of Session
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; objections sustained; prior warrant recalled; case remitted for compliance with statutory requirements.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of 'habitable Room', Burgh Police (scotland) Act 1892 Compliance, Building Alterations, Statutory Construction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Young
Appellant (master of Works)
Samuel Hill
Respondent (petitioner/proprietor)
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Dean of Guild Court Decision / First Division, Inner House, Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed attic room is a 'habitable room' under sections 172 and 173 of the Burgh Police (Scotland) Act 1892
- 2 Whether the intention of the proprietor regarding use is relevant to statutory compliance
Ratio Decidendi
A room equipped with features such as a fireplace and window, and structurally adapted for habitation, is a 'habitable room' under the Act, regardless of the proprietor's stated intention for its use. Statutory requirements must be met based on the objective characteristics of the room as shown in the plans.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; objections sustained; prior warrant recalled; case remitted for compliance with statutory requirements.
Orders
- Finds the proposed attic room is a habitable attic room under section 172 of the Burgh Police (Scotland) Act 1892 and does not conform to the Act.
- Recalls the interlocutor of 25th October 1901 granting warrant for alterations.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment